Tag Archives: year in review

Project Censored Top 25

You should buy Project Censored’s new book or otherwise support them if you can. And having said that, they appear to have posted their top 25 “most censored” stories of 2023 on RSS. Here are a few that caught my eye:

  • #22: Agricultural industry’s continued heavy use of antibiotics linked antibiotic resistance concerns in humans
  • #21: A lot of homeless people actually do some sort of paid work.
  • #19: One study estimated economic costs of gun violence in the U.S. at $557 billion per year. It may seem callous to “put a price on human life” this way, but hard nosed cost-benefit analysis can sometimes help justify better policy decisions, as it has for seat belts and air pollution controls, for example.
  • #16: Sixteen municipalities in Puerto Rico are suing fossil fuel giants under racketeering statutes for intentionally misleading the public about the causes of climate change. And #14: And it’s not just oil and gas companies – the electric industry was also very much in on the lies and cover ups that have altered our biosphere beyond the point of return over the past half century.
  • #15: In the U.S., data show black people are wrongfully convicted of murder about seven times more often than white people.
  • #5: The idea of buying carbon offsets to offset travel or other emissions-producing activities seems very attractive, but unfortunately, the objective evidence does not show them to be anywhere near as effective as advertised.

NYT best books of 2020

I plan to boycott giving the New York Times any money from now until the end of time because of the weapons of mass destruction debacle. Unless I get a letter or phone call of apology from Judith Miller herself.

So I had a look at the NYT best books on 2020 on this website. I don’t see anything I am likely to read here. I think Obama’s memoir is an important work of history. I don’t need to read it because I listened to his interview with Terry Gross the other day.

Shakespeare in a Divided America and War: How Conflict Shaped Us sound marginally interesting. I may add them to my list of more-books-than-I-can-read-before-I-die.

The problem with arguing that war is just part of the human condition is that weapons keep getting more dangerous. Eventually we will get to weapons so dangerous that a decision to use them is a decision civilization can never recover from. That decision might be completely irrational, but there may come a day when it only takes one irrational decision to bring civilization or even life on Earth crashing down around us.

2020 words of the year

The Oxford English Dictionary has released its “word of the year” for 2020, which consists of many words. This is the first “best of” article I have come come across this year, so this is officially my “first of the best of the best of” post. Note, not all things in my “best of” series are good, I just like to stick with the name.

This is really a whole “year in review” post with some vocabulary words thrown in. Here are some of them:

  • bushfires
  • Covid-19. Interesting – “coronavirus” was the term in March and April, then “Covid-19” became more popular from May on. Not surprisingly, “pandemic” was also popular.
  • WFH (I was thinking “work for hire”, but no, that doesn’t make any sense. This is “work from home”. Come on, the acronym takes the same amount of time to say as the words, and nobody is paying for paper or ink any more. We don’t need this acronym!) Also “remote” and “remotely”, “mute” and “unmute”. They don’t mention “virtual” but that is popular where I am.
  • lockdown and shelter-in-place. Not mentioned in the article is “stay at home”, which turned out to be the official legal term where I lived. It makes sense, because “shelter in place” conjures up visions of incoming missiles, and lockdown implies people can’t go outside, which was never actually the case. We also had “curfews” but these were used in reference to civil unrest.
  • circuit-breaker (didn’t see this term much in the U.S., but I saw it in Singapore government communications about their lockdown, forwarded by the U.S. embassy there. 10 years ago right now, I had recently arrived in Singapore for what would turn out to be a 3-year stint living and working there. After 7 years back in the U.S., I still get the dispatches from the embassy and have never taken the time to figure out how to turn them off. Anyway, I think this is a good way to communicate the purpose of Covid-19 related restrictions – they cause significant short-term inconvenience, like a blackout, but they prevent long-term catastrophe, like your house burning down.)
  • support bubbles (haven’t heard this one actually, but I think I can guess)
  • keyworkers (must be what we are calling “essential workers” here in the U.S. I assume locksmiths are included). “Frontliners” and “front line workers” have also been used.
  • social distancing, face masks, PPE (PPE also annoys me, but at least the acronym rolls off the tongue easier than the full name. In my opinion though, using industry-specific jargon never makes anyone sound smarter, especially jargon you just learned and act like you have always known.) Also mask up, anti-mask, anti-masker and mask-shaming. For the record, I wear a mask to protect myself and others, and even just to make others feel more comfortable even in low-risk situations. I still feel annoyed by the masks though, because they should be the last layer in a many-layered defense provided by our government. Because our government has failed in every other layer of defense, mask shaming and “personal responsibility” are all they have left. Fuck you guys. Do your jobs next time.
  • Superspreader
  • Reopening
  • furlough
  • Black Lives Matter, BLM (Bureau of Livestock and Mines?), George Floyd, cancel culture. I might add “police brutality” and “police reform”. I also found myself trying to distinguish between a “protest”, a “riot”, “civil unrest”, and “looting”. This year might be the first time I heard the term “civil unrest” referring to the present day where I actually live, rather than referring to the 1960s. I’m also going to add “of color”. It seems everyone now has to be classified as either white or “of color”. I’m not sure this captures the diversity of people we have in our country.
  • moonshot (Covid-19 vaccine development will probably go down in history as an example of how you can throw an enormous amount of money at a scientific problem and get rapid progress – alongside nuclear weapons and going to the moon. But this seems like easily the most positive and humanitarian of the three.)
  • unprecedented – gets used in the title and throughout the article, but they never actually call it the word of the year
  • mail-in
  • conspiracy theory, QAnon
  • “Isn’t now exactly the moment when we should be using Brexit more than ever?” (My answer as an American: NO!!! I’m sick of hearing about it. But maybe if you are in the UK it is relevant even if you are sick of it. My personal opinion is Europe is a nice continent and anyone should consider themselves fortunate to be part of it.)
  • Workcation and staycation are apparently popular somewhere, but I haven’t heard these much.
  • Impeachment, acquittal (already forgot about this)
  • “anthropause” – I have never heard this, but apparently it refers to a temporary dip in carbon emissions and air pollution during the pandemic. They say media coverage of climate change actually decreased for the year.

let the twenteen retrospectives begin!

Here we are a month and a half from the end of the decade, so I assume we are in for a tidal wave of not just 2019 retrospectives but 2010-2019 retrospectives. I am not too hopeful that we will ever pick a name for this decade, considering we have not even agreed on a name for the last one (I vote for the British entry, “the naughties”.) But anyway, “twenteens” is my humble proposal.

The first retrospective I have come across is from the podcast BackStory. This is a podcast where academic historians discuss current events, which I think is neat even though they sometimes try to make everything about race and gender when not everything is about race and gender. Anyway, I thought they might review some of the major geopolitical events of the decade, compare them to major geopolitical events of the past, and speculate on how we might view them in the future. But what they came up with was…social media. Well yeah, I guess the internet and our interactions with information and communication did continue to evolve in the past decade. I think one thing we have seen over the past decade is the democratization of propaganda – now anybody can try to confuse and misinform us, not just big governments and corporations.

Anyway, after I felt a little underwhelmed by that, I found myself needing to make a list of major geopolitical events and trends from the decade. Here is what I came up with.

  • Evidence of accelerating ecological collapse, and some halting steps to do something about it. The Paris climate accord, followed by the US. backing out of the Paris climate accord. When we look back in a few decades, the Paris accord could be seen as a turning point where the world started to come together and address a problem. Maybe we look back and see that we built on these first steps and ultimately succeeded, or maybe we look back on this as the only time we tried, and ultimately failed. Of course, global warming and sea level rise are not the only ecological issues we face. The most shocking stories I have read recently are about the sheer magnitude of the losses in natural habitats and animals, from insects to birds to mammals. A big chunk of what the planet had has vanished in a matter of decades, and the trend is snowballing.
  • Events in the greater Middle East. The initial hope of the “Arab Spring” followed by the grind of brutal and ongoing conflicts across the region, including the Syrian civil war and Yemen and U.S. military involvement across the entire region from Africa to Afghanistan. The Osama bin Laden assassination. The U.S. nuclear deal with Iran, followed by the U.S. backing out of the U.S. nuclear deal with Iran. The Iran-Russia axis vs. the U.S.-Israel-Saudi Arabia-UAE(-Pakistan?) axis. The weird Saudi Arabia-Qatar spat. The fraying of the U.S.-Turkey alliance. Renewed protests in Iraq and elsewhere at the end of the decade.
  • Nuclear proliferation and rearmament. The U.S. and Russia abandoning decades of treaties and gradual progress toward risk reduction. The never-ending Iran-Israel, North Korea, and Pakistan-India sagas.
  • Evaporation of the UN and international cooperation in general. When the U.S. invaded Iraq in 1991, it went to the UN security council and got approval to march across the borders of a sovereign UN member state. I naively thought that would be the new normal in post-Cold War conflicts. In the past decade, that has completely gone away with little or no consequences. The U.S. and Russia are in Syria, a sovereign UN member state, with no consequences. Russia is in Ukraine, a sovereign UN member state, with no consequences. So being a sovereign UN member state seems to offer no protection against invasion by a more powerful neighbor, and powerful countries don’t feel the need to consult the UN before invading a neighbor. It seems to me that this is a huge change in international norms over the past decade that could really raise the risk of a major war in the future. (By the way, Bernie Sanders is the only U.S. presidential candidate I have heard even mention reengaging with the UN.)
  • A decade without a world war, nuclear war, global pandemic, famine, or severe economic depression. Because we shouldn’t take any of this for granted, and hey I wanted to end on a high note.