Tag Archives: free speech

Reporters without Borders Press Freedom Index 2024

Reporters without Borders issues an annual Press Freedom Index. The United States ranks only 55 out of 180 countries in the index, so not quite in the top quartile. The top countries are mostly in Scandinavia and Northern Europe, while Eastern European nations, relatively benevolent island dictatorships, and some African countries make up a second tier coming in just ahead of the United States. They cite the dominance of the profit motive in U.S. journalism, the rise of openly partisan media outlets, and harassment, intimidation and assault of journalists both online and in real life.

Interestingly to me, they don’t mention the somewhat obvious manipulation of newsrooms by government and intelligence agencies. Maybe this goes hand in hand with the profit motive issue, when parroting press releases or relying on obvious plants is the most cost-effective way to churn out news. Consent doesn’t even have to be manufactured, it just happens by default.

rating news

I have an idea that maybe others have already thought of, but I haven’t seen it proposed (or implemented) in exactly the form i am thinking of. With all the newfound concern over “fake news”, misinformation, and disinformation, alongside good-old-fashioned government and corporate propaganda (which to its consternation is having some trouble competing with the former), I don’t see why news stories couldn’t be rated or certified as reliable by independent third parties. That is, you could pull up a news story from any of a number of outlets and see that it has the stamp of approval of a particular organization, say the Associated Press or the United Nations. Sites like Politifact and Snopes sort of do this now, but they aren’t rating individual stories. Any organization could create its own rating system, but at least people could choose a rating system they trusted and then either filter their search results or simply have the ratings they are interested in displayed, perhaps in a browser plug-in. It wouldn’t be perfect because it would give people way of filtering so they only hear what they want to hear, but at least we would be doing this explicitly rather than having hidden, amoral, profit-seeking algorithms decide behind the scenes what we see or don’t see.