Tag Archives: closing the loop

using less straws would be good, but obviously not enough

It should be obvious that you can’t just stop using plastic straws and pat yourself on the back for saving the earth. The much bigger problem is packaging, and this article in Scientific American has some ideas for how it could be tackled, and how it has been in a few countries not called the United States.

Legislators could make laws that incentivize and facilitate recycling, like the national bottle deposit and bag tax bills that were proposed in 2009. These bills would have created a nationwide five-cent deposit on plastic bottles and other containers, and a nonrefundable five-cent charge on plastic bags at checkout. The U.K. launched a similar charge on all single-use grocery bags in 2015 and announced a nationwide bottle deposit requirement in March of this year. Within six months of the plastic bag charge being in place, usage dropped over 80 percent. Similarly, in Germany, where a nationwide bottle bill was put in place in 2003, recycling rates have exceeded 98 percent. In the U.S. these actions would go a long way toward recovering the estimated $8 billion yearly economic opportunity cost of plastic waste.

Other actions could include a ban or “opt-in” policy on single-use items like plastic straws. That is, single-use plastic items would not be available or only upon request. A small tweak like this can lead to huge changes in consumer behavior, by making wastefulness an active choice rather than the status quo. Such measures were recently adopted by several U.S. cities, and are under consideration in California and the U.K.

Another, somewhat obvious, idea would be to tax packaging. This would raise some revenue while also nudging companies toward solutions that reduce, reuse, or recycle the packaging to avoid the tax. Some other tax could be reduced to offset this new one, if that seems critically important.

NYC banning styrofoam

NYC is banning styrofoam as of January 1, 2019.

The ban now means that food service establishments, stores, and manufacturers may not possess, sell, or offer for use single service Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) foam food service articles or loose fill packaging, such as “packing peanuts” in New York City beginning in 2019…

Manufacturers and stores will not be able to sell or offer single-use foam items such as cups, plates, trays, or clamshell containers in the city.

plastic risk

The bond rating agencies might go after companies that produce plastic packaging next. After taxing pollution like carbon emissions and other air and water pollutants, taxing waste products could make sense. These materials could be designed for easier recycling and reuse, and they are not because neither the manufacturer nor the retailer of the product inside them has to pay the cost. Homeowners, business owners, and municipalies pay the costs of waste collection and disposal, and natural ecosystems pay the price for plastic waste that is not being disposed of responsibly. Shifting these costs onto the manufacturers and/or retailers could raise funds to help deal with the problem while providing an incentive to innovate and produce better packaging and close the loop on materials.

Plastic packaging makers may be less credit-worthy in the future as governments try to curb marine litter, Moody’s Corp. said in a report…

Packaging consumes about 40 percent of plastics worldwide and accounts for about 60 percent of the material that ends up as waste. Governments worldwide are concerned that plastics take decades or even centuries to degrade and that they’ve been working their way into the food chain as they seep into rivers and oceans. By 2050, there will be more plastic than fish in the oceans, according to the Ellen MacArthur Foundation

The issue has garnered attention from one of the world’s biggest oil companies. Earlier this year, BP Plc cut its forecast for oil demand from petrochemicals by 2 million barrels a day, citing the risk that regulations tighten on plastic products and shopping bags. Packaging makes up about 3 percent of global oil use, according to the company’s chief economist, Spencer Dale.

Closing the loop might start to seem less crazy. My Amazon Fresh delivery person will pick up my used cooler – why not take back the plastic packaging for recycling, or develop other types of reusable containers? As more of this gets automated, hopefully the “ick” factor will be reduced.

I wish people would stop hating on plastic straws though. They are so tiny, and so useful to help children drink without spilling things. And have you ever tried to wash a “reusable” straw? Busy working people trying to raise the aforementioned children do not have time for that. So I say either invent a straw washing machine or give these tiny pieces of useful plastic a pass and focus on the mountains of plastic wrap and food containers that are actually filling our garbage cans, trucks and landfills.

household-scale biogas

It makes a lot of sense to combine sewage, yard waste and food waste in an anaerobic reactor to produce methane, which can be used for heat, to fuel vehicles, to generate electricity, or even to power fuel cells. This is done sometimes at a city or utility scale, but people haven’t really tried to do it in their basements. This article is about an attempt to do that in Yemen.

Los Angeles Stormwater Capture Plan

Los Angeles has a new stormwater capture plan out. They seem to focus mostly on the idea of using urban stormwater to recharge aquifers at the watershed to neighborhood scale.

The long term (by 2099) potential average annual capture volume was calculated for a conservative and aggressive scenario. Each was broken down by aquifer and between distributed capture and centralized capture. The fraction of the incoming flow to the City through direct precipitation, applied irrigation and run-on (831,400 acre-feet) that is currently captured in the existing baseline scenario is 11% (92,400 acre-feet). The fraction of the incoming flow to the City that could be captured ranges between 24% (197,300 acre-feet) and 33% (285,900), where the low value represents a conservative scenario and the higher value an aggressive scenario. This represents a captured volume of approximately double and triple the existing volume in the conservative and aggressive scenarios, respectively. As in the existing condition, most of the distributed recharge, and most of the increase in recharge, will take place in the San Fernando Valley and the Los Angeles Forebay area under all scenarios, reflecting well suited infiltration characteristics and the prioritization of Class 1 and Class 2 aquifers. It is important to note that the potential capture over the long term (to 2099) does not reflect the stated goals of the SCMP which will provide an implementation strategy for capture potential over the next 20 years.

This doesn’t really explore the idea of capturing and reusing more water at the site scale. If we really tried to close loops better at that scale, using a whole suite of water conservation, stormwater capture, and graywater tools, I feel like it could go a long way. You install waterless plumbing fixtures first (waterless urinals, composting toilets, urine-separating toilets), where practical, then the lowest-flow fixtures next (low flow showerheads and clotheswashers, dual-flush toilets). Then you capture stormwater in cisterns and rain barrels. Next is graywater – capturing and reusing water from clothes washers and showers. None of this is rocket science – it’s just plumbing, but the potential for creative and user-friendly designs just hasn’t been fully explored yet. People may think that the current generation of composting toilets and rain barrels is not worth the trouble even if they lower our water bills a little bit, so we need to design products that people want, like any other industry that competes for peoples’ attention and dollars.

 

May 2015 in Review

Negative stories:

  • MIT says there is a critical long term decline in U.S. research and development spending, while spending is increasing in many other parts of the world.
  • Lake Mead, water supply for Las Vegas and several other major western U.S. cities, is continuing to dry up. The normal snowpack in Washington State is almost completely absent, while much of Oregon has declared a state of emergency. As the drought grinds on, recycled water (sometimes derided as “toilet to tap”) is becoming more common in Calfornia. This is not bad in itself – on the contrary it is an example of technological adaptation and closing the loop. It does have a cost in money and energy though, which are resources that are then not available for other things like education or infrastructure or whatever people need. In other words, drought makes us all a little bit poorer.
  • We’ve hit 400 ppm carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, not just some places sometimes but pretty much everywhere, all the time.
  • There may be a “global shortage of aggregate demand“, and most countries are not dealing with it well. In many developed countries, increases in average longevity could lead to a trend of long-term deflation. This could eventually happen in almost all countries.
  • Climate change is going to make extreme weather more frequent and more damaging in U.S. cities. The 2015 El Nino could break records.
  • There just isn’t a lot of positivity or hope for better passenger rail service in the U.S.
  • Human chemical use to combat diseases, bugs, and weeds is causing the diseases, bugs and weeds to evolve fast.
  • Unfortunately there is no foolproof formula to make education work.

Positive stories:

  • Less leisure time could mean less sustainable outcomes, because people just have less time to think and act on their good intentions. I’m putting this in the positive column because although people in the U.S. and many other countries still work long hours, the trend so far is less work and more wealth for human population as a whole over very long periods of time. Obviously the transition is not smooth or painless for all workers all of the time.
  • I found a nice example of meta-analysis, which aggregates findings of a large number of scientific and not-so-scientific studies in a useful form, in this case in the urban planning field.
  • May is time to pull on the urban gardening gloves.
  • Melbourne’s climate change adaptation plan focuses on green open space and urban tree canopy.
  • Painless vaccines may be on the way.
  • The rhetoric on renewable energy is really changing as it starts to seriously challenge fossil fuels on economic grounds. Following the Fukushima disaster, when all Japan’s nuclear reactors were shut down, the gap was made up largely with liquid natural gas and with almost no disruption of consumer service. But renewables also grew explosively. Some are suggesting Saudi Arabia is supporting lower oil prices in part to stay competitive with renewables. Wind and solar capacity are growing quickly in many parts of the world. Lester Brown says the tide has turned and renewables are now unstoppable.
  • Commercial autonomous trucks are here.
  • The UK may have hit “peak car“.
  • Seattle is allowing developers to provide car share memberships and transit passes in lieu of parking spaces.

recycled water

Recycled water, i.e. treating sewage back to drinking water standards, has been around for awhile and doesn’t raise many eyebrows in truly water scarce areas. Which is why it is getting more popular and less controversial in California cities. Here are some fun pictures of politicians drinking it out of beakers with big smiles on their faces.

Which, maybe because we are in mayoral election season here in Philadelphia, reminded me of this great scene from The Wire.

 

saving energy by saving water

An article in Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management quantifies the energy savings that result from water conservation.

Saving water saves energy. Consequently, implementing integrated water management (IWM) measures that reduce potable water consumption, stormwater runoff, and wastewater generation can potentially translate into significant energy savings. In this paper, the energy savings associated with IWM measures of rainwater harvesting and gray-water reuse are estimated, both at national and local utility scales using published data. At the national scale, it is estimated in this paper that up to 3.8billionkWh and $270 million can potentially be saved annually by replacing landscape irrigation and other outdoor water uses through rainwater harvesting alone, and up to 14billionkWh and $950 million in combination with gray-water reuse. Similarly, in Charlotte, North Carolina, the local water utility can potentially save up to 31millionkWh and $1.8 million annually. However, annual energy and associated cost savings per household are low at either scale, ranging between 1 and 120 kWh with associated cost savings of less than $10. These results are discussed in terms of energy savings’ role in IWM policy considerations and promotion of sustainable water use in urban areas.

electric indoor compost bin

I’m upset, because I was going to invent this.

Oh well, I suppose I didn’t really have time to invent it, or know how to do it. If it really works as well as advertised, it’s potentially a big advance in closing the loop.

I have to point out that aerobic compost won’t actually reduce carbon emissions compared to landfilling the same waste or putting it down the garbage disposal. But the carbon is the same carbon absorbed when the plants were grown, and in this case you haven’t produced waste at all, but instead turned the carbon and nutrients in your groceries into healthy soil and plants on your own property. You’ve saved a few trips to the Home Depot, which means you saved energy and reduced pollution from the gasoline you would have put in your car, reduced your risk of injury or death in a car crash, reduced the amount of chemical fertilizer produced in natural gas refineries and phosphate mining operations, reduced energy required to truck bags of topsoil and fertilizer around, reduced the risk of death and injury that entails, diverted nutrients from surface water or groundwater (where they are pollution) to your soil (where they are a resource), maybe grown some food, gotten some exercise and squeezed in some precious leisure time out in the garden. Or maybe you gave some compost away, made a friend or even sold the stuff. If there are enough people like you, Home Depot may not need to have such a big parking lot, which would reduce stormwater runoff, urban heat, demand for pavement (which really will reduce carbon emissions), and open up land for more economically or ecologically productive or leisurely uses.