Author Archives: rdmyers75@hotmail.com

EIA Annual Energy Outlook 2022

The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) has a new report out with projections through 2050. The graphs are worth staring at. Here are some takeaways for me.

  • Coal use has crashed from over 20% of energy consumption 10 years ago to around 10% now. The rise in renewable energy mirrors it, from less than 5% to nearly 20%. Natural gas also surged during this period to replace the decline in coal, from around 20 to 30+ percent. Oil just kind of bumps along in the 30-40% range. The projection in 2050 is something like oil 40%, natural gas 35%, renewables 20%, everything else less than 10%.
  • The carbon footprint of electric power generation a decade ago was greater than the transportation sector. It has declined significantly (I assume this reflects the substitution of natural gas and renewables for coal), and is projected to continue to decline. The carbon footprint of transportation and industry is projected to remain relatively flat.
  • The biggest gains in renewable energy are projected to come from solar. Solar is projected to grow regardless of changes in cost, whereas wind and other sources are shown as more sensitive to cost, meaning if cost is high their share stops growing. I assume this has a lot to do with the cost of solar being pretty low already.
  • They show solar energy and battery storage being used extensively to meet peak mid-day demand by 2050.
  • Somewhat disappointing and surprising to me, they show electric vehicles sales only slowly displacing a small portion of gasoline-powered (3%?) vehicle sales over the next 30 years. I hope they are wrong about this one.

I can imagine a past world where safe civilian nuclear technology had been used more widely over the last 50 years or so, and we are not in the climate mess we are in today. Maybe this is even a world where the proliferation of nuclear weapons is less prevalent, but I am not sure about that. This is not the world we live in.

I can imagine a near-future world where homes, businesses, industry, and vehicles are increasingly electrified, and electricity generation is increasingly shifted to renewables. I still think nuclear power might be able to play an important role in this world. But it does not seem like we are headed in the direction of this world, at least not quickly enough to avoid a major train wreck. I hope I am wrong.

Opossums

I like the little guys. They are not “immune” to rabies or Lyme disease, as some have claimed, but they seem to get these diseases fairly rarely. They can carry fleas and ticks because…they’re animals. Although one study suggested they like to eat a lot of ticks, other studies have failed to confirm this unfortunately. This article cites a number of good things about them, and then seems to reach an illogical conclusion that they are nonetheless pests. I don’t quite get it – yes, they have sharp teeth and might use them if they are really cornered, or if a house pet that doesn’t know any better attacks them. That’s about it.

While it’s true that opossums eat ticks, thereby potentially preventing some spread of Lyme disease, their good characteristics may be overhyped by some social media users. Opossum-control mechanisms vary by state, but most pest control experts recommend treating their removal in the same way as one would treat raccoons or skunks. After determining that an opossum has moved in, experts say to make the surroundings less appealing to them by cleaning up overgrown shrubbery and trees that they may use to hide in, clean up fallen fruit, and hide garbage cans, pet food containers, or other food sources. Secure home areas so that they cannot hide out under stairways or other nooks and crannies.

Snopes

This sounds like a pretty good prescription to remove wildlife habitat in general on your property. Anything that is not mown turf grass with maybe the occasional well-mulched tree is “overgrown” in the eyes of some (not mine).

Philadelphia census

The Inquirer has a decent analysis of U.S. census results for Philly. You have to subscribe the Inquirer to read it (which I have done maybe because I was shamed by one of those articles about the decline of local news? also since I don’t really watch TV I am aware of almost no local news unless I pay for it). Anyway, a couple highlights although the graphics are worth a look:

  • They provide the Gini index and change in the Gini index over the last 5 years or so. Income inequality has gotten worse, and Philadelphia proper is the worst in the Philadelphia metro area. They point out that this could be because the rich have gotten richer or the poor have gotten poorer, or both, but then they don’t dig into that any further.
  • The depressing statistic remains that Philadelphia is the poorest major city in the United States at over 20% of residents living in poverty. This is pathetic. They picked 10 “major cities” (not clear if these are counties or metro areas) – Houston, Dallas, and San Antonio are the next poorest after Philly (go Texas!) and Chicago, New York and Los Angeles are 5-7 respectively, with San Diego and San Jose bringing up the rear (i.e., the best of the worst? or the best of the worst of the biggest?). So whatever the impression we might get in the media, the economy in California seems to be doing a bit better than Texas if poverty is the metric. The article points out that social benefits like food stamps are not considered (but maybe tax benefits like the earned income tax credit would be?) but doesn’t dig into it further.
  • About 2 of 3 Philadelphia residents were born in Pennsylvania, indicating people are not that mobile and we are not attracting new residents from elsewhere the way the sun belt cities generally area. They did not do this analysis by metro area, so including people from the New Jersey and Delaware might push this number even higher (and excluding people from, say, the northwestern tip of the state which is a 7 hour drive from here probably would not push it that much lower.)
  • Philadelphia has the second lowest percentage of foreign-born residents of the 10 cities (counties? metro areas?) studied. San Antonio had the lowest, so being near a militarized international border does not seem to correlate to attracting immigrants. Interestingly, Interestingly Philadelphia has the highest percentage of immigrants from Africa at about 11% of immigrants. Houston and Dallas are next, which again I wouldn’t have guessed. But I would keep in mind that in terms of sheer numbers, New York, LA, and Chicago may still have the most people in almost any category.
  • A majority of people over the age of 15 have never been married. This is interesting. Does this mean our city is particularly young (I don’t think so), particular groups are not getting married (I think so), or people are getting married later in life? To answer the last question, it would be interesting to know what age people tend to get married on average. I got married at 30, so if the average age were to be 25 or 30, what percent of people over that age have ever been married? What percent of people who are not married now will eventually get married? That would be an interesting number. 18% of all people over 15 are separated, divorced, or widowed (but if you want to know what % of people who get married eventually get divorced or separated, you would want to separate out the people who are widowed.) 50% of people who get married and don’t get divorced are going to get widowed – there’s a depressing thought. Or I guess it would be slightly less than 50% – I suppose a few couples go down together in car or plane crashes, sinking boats, fires/floods/building collapses, or the very occasional suicide pact. That’s sweet, now I feel better.

six simple things you can do to save the Earth…

The University of Leeds has an article (which I found through the Guardian) listing six things individuals can do to make a meaningful climate impact. My comments in brackets.

  1. “Eat a largely plant-based diet, with healthy portions and no waste.” [this sounds good]
  2. “Buy no more than three new items of clothing per year.” [I’m not a big clothes shopper, but even socks and underwear wear out faster than this. And my family’s economic livelihood requires me to not look like a complete slob at work. They also tell us to exercise, and that is going to wear out our footwear at least once a year. So I am not sure this is practical. What we can do is resist the fashion industry mind control telling us clothes are disposable, and just replace them as they wear out. We could move more towards mending clothes and shoes that wear out, but this is not a good use of time for busy people. I like the idea of taking more items to tailors and cobblers to be repaired, although this will likely not save money given labor costs in developed countries vs. low labor, material, and shipping costs in developing countries. We could also make it much easier to donate and repurpose old clothes. Right now shoving them in a trash bag is often the easiest thing for busy people to do.]
  3. Keep electrical products for at least seven years. [Again, I think we can just replace things as they wear out. Getting service and repairs on appliances is way harder than it should be, and getting good information to inform a repair/replace decision is also very hard. And again, donating/disposing of appliances and devices is hard. My basement is full of old things I know I am not supposed to put in the trash, but there are not easy pickup options and I have not had time to take them to the place I am supposed to take them, partly because I am a good-two-shoes who doesn’t drive much (see below).]
  4. Take no more than one short-haul flight every three years and one long-haul flight every eight years. [This is a tough one. I understand flights are a big problem, but I also think there is value in international peace and understanding to people traveling more, not less. Carbon offsets are out there, although I know they are not perfect – we need better information on how to access these and which programs can be trusted. Ultimately, I think this one needs to be solved by governments and scientists and industrialists – hydrogen fuel cells seem promising. High speed rail could solve the short-haul problem if our cowardly cynical politicians would let that happen. Driving those short and intermediate distances is not the solution – again see below.]
  5. Just don’t drive. [I am 100% on board with this, and unlike the vegetarian thing I practice what I preach. People say they can’t do this because of where they live, but I always urge people to think about where they might like to and be able to live in five years. That is a long-enough time frame to think about making a change, but short enough it is not the bulk of a person’s life. Of course, the supply of walkable places in the United States is extremely limited, and limited things that are in high demand are expensive, so the vast majority of people assume this is not a practical option even if they like the idea. Many people don’t like the idea because they have never experienced and can’t imagine a non-driving-based lifestyle. I am not talking about forcing people to change lifestyles – I am talking about our cowardly cynical politicians giving us a lot more choices.]
  6. “Make at least one life shift to nudge the system, like moving to a green energy, insulating your home or changing pension supplier.” [These are actually short-term investments that have a longer-term positive return. This is something we irrational, short-lived humans are not good at doing, but where there is free money in the future that can be shifted forward in time some government program or entrepreneur should be able to come up with solutions. We don’t do this because of failures of communication, innovation, or trust.]

So live somewhere you can make most work, school, and shopping trips on foot or by bicycle. Eat less or no meat. Replace stuff when it wears out, and think about repairing and/or donating rather than just junking. Work toward home energy efficiency. I don’t want to stop traveling, but I hope doing some of the other things will at least partially offset my travel impacts, and I can think about offsets to cover the rest. And then we need to improve our democracy and get rid of those cynical cowards!

why daylight savings time is unhealthy

There is a clear consensus that everybody hates setting the clocks ahead and losing sleep. There seems to be movement toward doing away with this dumb tradition and going towards all daylight savings time all year. But at least one scientist says the evidence points toward going all standard time all year.

  • There is evidence for increased strokes, heart attacks, and sleep deprivation during daylight saving time, the latter particularly affecting teenagers. There is also evidence of increased obesity, diabetes, cancer, lower income and higher health care costs in the western portions of time zones, where the shift in dawn and dusk is most pronounced.
  • The lack of morning light disrupts the body’s natural rhythms when we are trying to wake up.
  • Increased light in the evening makes it harder to fall asleep. This is particularly hard on adolescents and young adults, who have trouble falling asleep already for biological reasons and often have to wake up early for school, leading to chronic sleep deprivation affecting their already wacked-out bodies and minds.
  • Standard time is a better match for the natural rhythm of the sun, with the sun directly overhead around noon.

I would add that the time shift causes trouble in science and other technical fields, where we try to measure stuff over time and make sense of it. It also causes practical problems for people who have to travel or collaborate with colleagues across time zones (which is already challenging). Once I got a roomful of people together at 7 a.m. in Singapore for a meeting led by U.S. staff, only to find that the U.S. had changed its clocks the night before and the meeting was over. Those people were a little mad at me. I bought them doughnuts. A lesson learned there is to let your calendar software handle time zones and not try to do the math yourself. The U.S. is not even the worst – Australia has half-hour time shifts that are different in different cities not that far apart. The time shift is dumb, let’s just stop doing it.

the highway of death

Here’s what it looks like when a large military convoy is bombed. In 1991 the U.S. had clear air superiority over an opponent without weapons of mass destruction (unlike in 2003, Iraq did have an active nuclear program at the time but I think that by this point it was clear they did not have weapons that they were willing or able to use.)

other diseases to think about

Are you sick and tired of worrying about Covid-19? You may feel better if you take a step back and realize it is just one of many horrible and exotic (not to mention horrible and common) diseases you can be terrified of.

A couple of hantavirus cases have popped up, spread by rats in Washington D.C. The article mentions Baltimore as another rat capital. Luckily it doesn’t mention Philadelphia so there is nothing to worry about, although I see them frequently around my neighborhood due to the completely inept trash pickup practices in our city. I also see them frequently around construction sites and occasionally in parks. I have never seen one indoors but we see plenty of their less terrifying cousins the mice, which also can spread hantavirus. The article describes one person who contracted hantavirus, is a plumber’s assistant, and does not believe he could have been exposed through his work. Well, have a look behind the walls in an old house in any of the cities mentioned above and you will see plenty of evidence of rodent activity. Apparently he is okay and I wish him well.

This is also concerning:

According to DLD Director-General Sorawit Thanito, the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) recorded outbreaks of avian influenza at 5,213 locations in 61 countries for 2021. A recent OIE article published on February 25, 2022, reported outbreaks of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) H5N1 H5N6 H5N2 H5N5, and H5N8 viruses in more than 30 countries across Africa, America, Europe and Asia. The World Health Organization (WHO) has meanwhile reported human infection cases and fatalities of H5N6 avian influenza in China.

Pattaya Mail

Nothing to worry about. The infected birds may be all over the world, and the 1918 flu may have been a bird flu, but only some unknown number of human beings has been infected and killed so far. These people were far away, not U.S. citizens, and I can’t think of any recent cases of exotic fatal diseases that started in China and spread to the rest of the world, can you? At least we have had a bit of a dress rehearsal for a really bad flu outbreak.

the war in Ukraine

I keep saying I don’t want to analyze fast moving current events, but I can’t help it. Here are a few things I want to say. It’s March 5, 2022 as I write this.

First, Putin’s actions are deplorable and inexcusable in terms of the human suffering they are causing and in terms of the very real risk of nuclear war they entail. Nothing I say below changes this. To say any of the points below excuse Putin’s actions would be like Hitler saying “Stalin did it first”. (Stalin slaughtered millions of Ukrainians before Hitler slaughtered millions of Ukrainians and Poles, among many others. Tens of millions of wrongs obviously don’t make a right. They add up to pure and unfathomable evil. Putin is putting himself in this category although he is only slaughtering human beings by the hundreds or thousands so far. But we are one nuclear exchange away from a body count even Hitler and Stalin might not have been able to fathom.)

There is a lot of obvious propaganda coming from the Russian side. There are a lot of lies (many so obvious they are just dumb) posted on social media by random people for random reasons. But there is also obvious spin coming from the U.S. government, and our media and public is buying into it without question. You don’t have to support Putin to just be a little skeptical about what you are hearing and ask who you are hearing it from and what their motivations might be. We are hearing that the war is going unexpectedly badly for the Russians. We are hearing that Russian morale is low. We are hearing and seeing videos of ordinary people stopping tanks and standing up to soldiers. We are hearing that Russia has not established air superiority. We are hearing that Putin is irrational or mentally ill. There may be kernels of truth to any and all of this, but it is all coming from U.S. government/military/intelligence sources and being parroted uncritically by our media. Government officials at all levels are giving interviews with very similar talking points, suggesting to me that it is a coordinated intelligence effort. Major newsrooms are either in on the propaganda effort (as it is clear to me they were on the Iraq weapons of mass destruction debacle), or they just don’t have other sources of news so all they can do is repeat what they are hearing from the government and each other.

Take any article on the situation and replace Russia or Putin with the United States, then replace Ukraine with Iraq. The world could have justified imposing “crippling sanctions” on the U.S. for that illegal “war of choice”. They don’t do that because they don’t have the political, military, or financial power to get on the wrong side of the United States, and we abuse that power.

Russia clearly felt threatened by that U.S. war, and by the NATO wars on Libya and even going back to the 1990s NATO war on Serbia.. The Afghanistan war seemed like a justified defensive action at the time even though it seems pointless in retrospect, but it was in Russia’s backyard and they could easily feel threatened. The U.S. has intervened in Syria, brought former Soviet countries into NATO, and almost certainly interfered in Ukrainian elections. Again, try to put ourselves in their shoes and we would be outraged to find that Russia had interfered with a Canadian or Mexican election let alone formed a military alliance with those countries. And remember when they formed a military alliance with Cuba and a nuclear war almost happened? Even the 1991 Gulf War must have been threatening to Russia as it seemed so overwhelming and came at a time of Russian weakness. Looked at another way, that war seemed at the time like a case where a sovereign UN member state was invaded by its neighbor, and the world came together to make it clear that would not be tolerated. Maybe this should have been the principle ever since then, rather than expansion of a (perceived) aggressive alliance in Eastern Europe. (Sorry Taiwan, this doesn’t help you.)

Now add U.S. politicians openly calling for Putin’s assassination, and imagine how outraged we would be if that rhetoric were reversed. Add the CIA openly salivating over the idea of a prolonged insurgency. Don’t think about a repeat of the death squads that caused so many civilians in Iraq and throughout Latin America to be tortured and disappeared, as the U.S. embraced right-wing elements and looked the other way in an enemy-of-my-enemy-is-my-friend mentality.

I won’t second guess our political and military leadership in their response to this acute crisis, although the idea of NATO countries openly leaving guns and tanks on the border of Ukraine and Poland seems like a serious escalation to me. I assume the U.S. and NATO are openly sharing intelligence and advising the Ukrainian military on maneuvers. What are the chances there are really no CIA paramilitary or U.S. special forces in Ukraine? At least no tactical nuclear weapons have been deployed that we know of, and no naval confrontations have occurred.

Once this crisis passes and the dust settles, assuming it eventually does, maybe a group of courageous politicians could get together and make a serious renewed effort at arms control and risk reduction. That would be the absolute best outcome we can hope for from this crisis.

back to drugs and crime

Recently I said my thoughts on the relationship between violence and the drug economy were evolving. Well, here is a paper from Temple University showing evidence that a lot of violence is linked to the drug economy. They look at neighborhoods in Philadelphia that are similar across most variables other than drug activity, and show that the neighborhoods with more drug activity have more violence.

If you are experiencing a nuclear explosion press 1

As I was doom scrolling yet again to check if the nuclear missiles are incoming, I came across this helpful website from ready.gov.

If you are experiencing a nuclear explosion and are still able to walk, first you should go to your basement and stay there for at least 24 hours. That makes sense to me. Second, and this is a little weird, you should take a shower if you can. I guess some people have showers in their basements. Third, and this is where it gets really weird, you should stock your basement with a vintage hand-cranked videocassette player and a VHS copy of the 1983 made-for-TV movie The Day After, starring 1983 John Lithgow, who was already not young, playing a plucky ham radio operator who will tell you what is going on. Finally, and this is where it gets unbelievable, you should call your health care provider.

Hello, this is your United States health care provider. Listen carefully as menu options keep changing. If you do not have insurance, press 1 and a recorded voice will tell you to go fuck yourself. If you have insurance, press 2.

Congratulations, you have pressed 2 indicating you have some type of health insurance. If you have a pain in the ass or balls, this may require specialist attention. If your health insurance does not cover this, press 1. Otherwise press 3.

Congratulations, you have pressed 3, indicating you have half decent health insurance. If you are experiencing A NUCLEAR EXPLOSION right now, press 4.

You have pressed 4, indicating you are experiencing or have experienced A NUCLEAR EXPLOSION. If your flesh has not melted from your bones and your bones turned to ash and blown away on the blast wave like in the opening scene of Terminator 2, please press 5 or stay on the line and a scheduling specialist may assist you.

Congratulations, you have pressed 5 indicating that you have experienced A NUCLEAR EXPLOSION but are somehow still alive and in urgent need of medical attention. We’re sorry, all our scheduling specialists are currently assisting other callers. Your call is important to us. The next appointment with your health care provider is in 6 months. But your health care provider’s schedule is only posted for the next 3 months, whatever that means. No, we won’t call you. You can try to call us in 3 months. Or you can try to call us every day and check if we have a cancellation. No, we won’t call you about that either. If you have a problem with that, you can just go ahead and press 1.

No, don’t be stupid and confuse this with The Day After Tomorrow.
Now that’s some dark shit. And we don’t need evil robots because we have politicians. Politicians, let’s keep this only in the movies okay?